Locked In Trading vs SYBZ: Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of Locked In Trading and SYBZ on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| Locked In Trading | SYBZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.0 / 5 | 2.1 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €500 | €100 |
| EUR/USD spread | 1.4 pips | 1.9 pips |
| Regulation | Unregulated / regulator-warned | Unregulated / regulator-warned |
| Max leverage | 1:888 | 1:500 |
| Platforms | MT5 | Proprietary, WebTrader |
| Withdrawal time | 7 business days | 7 business days |
| Trustpilot | 1.6/5 (17) | 1.1/5 (45) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
Locked In Trading
Unauthorised Forex/CFD website on the AMF/ACPR French blacklist.
Not recommendedSYBZ
Website ordered blocked (oscuramento) by Italy's CONSOB as an unauthorised operator.
Not recommendedOur verdict
SYBZ edges ahead on minimum deposit, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.1 versus 2.0 for Locked In Trading. That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: Locked In Trading still comes out ahead on withdrawal speed, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full Locked In Trading review or the SYBZ review.