IGM FX vs SolidCFD: Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of IGM FX and SolidCFD on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| IGM FX | SolidCFD | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.0 / 5 | 2.0 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €250 | €250 |
| EUR/USD spread | 1.9 pips | 2 pips |
| Regulation | Investor warnings (CySEC-linked — IGM Forex Ltd) | Unauthorised (FCA Warning List — LOK Marketing Ltd) |
| Max leverage | 1:400 | 1:400 |
| Platforms | MT4, WebTrader | WebTrader, Proprietary |
| Withdrawal time | 12 business days | 14 business days |
| Trustpilot | 2/5 (130) | 1.9/5 (140) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
IGM FX
CIF brand tied to CySEC action and cross-border investor warnings.
Not recommendedSolidCFD
Brand named on the FCA Warning List of unauthorised firms.
Not recommendedOur verdict
IGM FX edges ahead on platforms, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.0 versus 2.0 for SolidCFD. That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: SolidCFD still comes out ahead on platforms, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full IGM FX review or the SolidCFD review.