IGM FX vs Locked In Trading: Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of IGM FX and Locked In Trading on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| IGM FX | Locked In Trading | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.1 / 5 | 2.0 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €250 | €500 |
| EUR/USD spread | 1.9 pips | 1.4 pips |
| Regulation | Investor warnings (CySEC-linked — IGM Forex Ltd) | Unregulated / regulator-warned |
| Max leverage | 1:400 | 1:888 |
| Platforms | MT4, WebTrader | MT5 |
| Withdrawal time | 12 business days | 7 business days |
| Trustpilot | 2/5 (130) | 1.6/5 (17) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
IGM FX
CIF brand tied to CySEC action and cross-border investor warnings.
Not recommendedLocked In Trading
Unauthorised Forex/CFD website on the AMF/ACPR French blacklist.
Not recommendedOur verdict
IGM FX edges ahead on platforms, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.1 versus 2.0 for Locked In Trading. That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: Locked In Trading still comes out ahead on withdrawal speed, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full IGM FX review or the Locked In Trading review.