GMT Brokers vs Locked In Trading: Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of GMT Brokers and Locked In Trading on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| GMT Brokers | Locked In Trading | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.1 / 5 | 2.0 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €250 | €500 |
| EUR/USD spread | 2 pips | 1.4 pips |
| Regulation | Unauthorised (CONSOB oscuramento — GMT Brokers Ltd) | Unregulated / regulator-warned |
| Max leverage | 1:500 | 1:888 |
| Platforms | MT4, WebTrader | MT5 |
| Withdrawal time | 14 business days | 7 business days |
| Trustpilot | 1.9/5 (55) | 1.6/5 (17) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
GMT Brokers
Website blacked out by Italy’s CONSOB for abusive financial services.
Not recommendedLocked In Trading
Unauthorised Forex/CFD website on the AMF/ACPR French blacklist.
Not recommendedOur verdict
GMT Brokers edges ahead on platforms, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.1 versus 2.0 for Locked In Trading. That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: Locked In Trading still comes out ahead on withdrawal speed, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full GMT Brokers review or the Locked In Trading review.