GCG International vs Lumex (Stratoslumex): Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of GCG International and Lumex (Stratoslumex) on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| GCG International | Lumex (Stratoslumex) | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.1 / 5 | 2.1 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €100 | €250 |
| EUR/USD spread | 1.9 pips | 2 pips |
| Regulation | Unregulated / regulator-warned | Unregulated / regulator-warned |
| Max leverage | 1:500 | 1:888 |
| Platforms | Proprietary, WebTrader | MT4, MT5 |
| Withdrawal time | 7 business days | 7 business days |
| Trustpilot | 1.8/5 (68) | 1.9/5 (88) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
GCG International
Listed on the FSMA (Belgium) list of fraudulent trading platforms.
Not recommendedLumex (Stratoslumex)
Website ordered blocked (oscuramento) by Italy's CONSOB as an unauthorised operator.
Not recommendedOur verdict
GCG International edges ahead on minimum deposit, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.1 versus 2.1 for Lumex (Stratoslumex). That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: Lumex (Stratoslumex) still comes out ahead on withdrawal speed, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full GCG International review or the Lumex (Stratoslumex) review.