FX-FLAT vs IGM FX: Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of FX-FLAT and IGM FX on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| FX-FLAT | IGM FX | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.2 / 5 | 2.1 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €100 | €250 |
| EUR/USD spread | 1.2 pips | 1.9 pips |
| Regulation | Unregulated / regulator-warned | Investor warnings (CySEC-linked — IGM Forex Ltd) |
| Max leverage | 1:1000 | 1:400 |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5 | MT4, WebTrader |
| Withdrawal time | 7 business days | 12 business days |
| Trustpilot | 1.4/5 (79) | 2/5 (130) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
FX-FLAT
Website ordered blocked (oscuramento) by Italy's CONSOB as an unauthorised operator.
Not recommendedIGM FX
CIF brand tied to CySEC action and cross-border investor warnings.
Not recommendedOur verdict
FX-FLAT edges ahead on minimum deposit, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.2 versus 2.1 for IGM FX. That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: IGM FX still comes out ahead on platforms, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full FX-FLAT review or the IGM FX review.