Bacco Capital vs QW Limited (Quantumwins): Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of Bacco Capital and QW Limited (Quantumwins) on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| Bacco Capital | QW Limited (Quantumwins) | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.2 / 5 | 2.2 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €250 | €100 |
| EUR/USD spread | 1.8 pips | 2 pips |
| Regulation | Unregulated / regulator-warned | Unregulated / regulator-warned |
| Max leverage | 1:500 | 1:1000 |
| Platforms | Proprietary, WebTrader | Proprietary, WebTrader |
| Withdrawal time | 7 business days | 7 business days |
| Trustpilot | 1.5/5 (19) | 1.5/5 (99) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
Bacco Capital
Unauthorised Forex/CFD website on the AMF/ACPR French blacklist.
Not recommendedQW Limited (Quantumwins)
Website ordered blocked (oscuramento) by Italy's CONSOB as an unauthorised operator.
Not recommendedOur verdict
Bacco Capital edges ahead on withdrawal speed, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.2 versus 2.2 for QW Limited (Quantumwins). That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: QW Limited (Quantumwins) still comes out ahead on minimum deposit, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full Bacco Capital review or the QW Limited (Quantumwins) review.