Asset-Ace vs InterBrokers: Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of Asset-Ace and InterBrokers on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| Asset-Ace | InterBrokers | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.1 / 5 | 2.2 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €500 | €100 |
| EUR/USD spread | 1.5 pips | 1.5 pips |
| Regulation | Unregulated / regulator-warned | Unregulated / regulator-warned |
| Max leverage | 1:888 | 1:500 |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary, WebTrader |
| Withdrawal time | 7 business days | 7 business days |
| Trustpilot | 2.5/5 (65) | 1.7/5 (103) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
Asset-Ace
Unauthorised Forex/CFD website on the AMF/ACPR French blacklist.
Not recommendedInterBrokers
Unauthorised crypto-asset derivatives website on the AMF/ACPR French blacklist.
Not recommendedOur verdict
InterBrokers edges ahead on minimum deposit, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.2 versus 2.1 for Asset-Ace. That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: Asset-Ace still comes out ahead on withdrawal speed, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full Asset-Ace review or the InterBrokers review.