AHP vs SRINVA: Which is better in 2026?
A neutral, side-by-side comparison of AHP and SRINVA on the criteria that matter — regulation, fees, leverage, platforms and withdrawal speed. Scores are objective and never influenced by affiliation.
| AHP | SRINVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 2.2 / 5 | 2.2 / 5 |
| Minimum deposit | €100 | €250 |
| EUR/USD spread | 1.6 pips | 1.7 pips |
| Regulation | Unregulated / regulator-warned | Unregulated / regulator-warned |
| Max leverage | 1:500 | 1:500 |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary, WebTrader |
| Withdrawal time | 7 business days | 7 business days |
| Trustpilot | 2/5 (82) | 1.5/5 (27) |
| Rating | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
AHP
Website ordered blocked (oscuramento) by Italy's CONSOB as an unauthorised operator.
Not recommendedSRINVA
Website blocked by CONSOB (Italy) for the unauthorised provision of investment services.
Not recommendedOur verdict
AHP edges ahead on minimum deposit, finishing with an overall neutral score of 2.2 versus 2.2 for SRINVA. That said, the gap is narrow and depends on your priorities: SRINVA still comes out ahead on withdrawal speed, so traders who weight that most highly may prefer it. Both are credible, vetted options — check regulation, fees and withdrawal terms against your own needs before choosing.
Read the full AHP review or the SRINVA review.